🏠 NEET Home

NEET 2027 · Biology · Class 12 Chapter 5 · File MBI-03

The whole chapter on one page

Formulas, numbers, scientists, exceptions and mnemonics, plus the written defence for each of the recurring error families.

Built for printing. Nothing here needs reasoning — it all needs recall.

What this file is. Everything in the chapter that has to be recalled rather than reasoned, on one printable page. Use it for the last pass before an ILTS paper and for the March–April revision block.

Every formula in the chapter

QuantityFormulaWorked example
Length of a DNA moleculebp × 0.34 nm6.6×10⁹ bp → 2.2 m
Number of helical turnsbp ÷ 1023,000 bp → 2300 turns
Length from turnsturns × 3.4 nm2300 → 7820 nm = 7.82 μm
Chargaff, one base givenA = (100 − 2×given) ÷ 2C = 20% → A = 30%
Chargaff from a ratio r = (A+T)/(G+C)G + C = 100 ÷ (r + 1)r = 1.5 → G+C = 40 → G = 20%
DNA molecules after n generations2ⁿn = 3 → 8 molecules
Hybrid molecules after n generationsalways exactly 2
Percentage hybrid(2 ÷ 2ⁿ) × 100n = 2 → 50%
Nucleosomes in a stretch of DNAbp ÷ 2006×10⁵ bp → 3000
Codons unaffected by a deletion at position pwhole part of (p − 1) ÷ 3p = 901 → 300 codons
Complete codons in a stretch of n baseswhole part of n ÷ 398 bases → 32 codons, 2 left over

Every number worth memorising

ValueWhat it belongs to
0.34 nmrise per base pair
3.4 nmpitch — one full turn
10base pairs per turn
2 nmdiameter of the helix
2 and 3hydrogen bonds in A=T and G≡C
5386 nucleotidesbacteriophage φX174 — single-stranded
48,502 bpbacteriophage lambda
4.6 × 10⁶ bpE. coli genome
3.3 × 10⁹ bphuman haploid genome
2.2 mtotal DNA length in one human cell
2000 bp per secondpolymerisation rate at an E. coli fork
18 minutestime for E. coli to finish replication
200–300adenylate residues in the poly-A tail
200 bpDNA wrapped in one nucleosome
8 = 2 × 4histones in the octamer core
64 / 61 / 3total codons / sense codons / stop codons
2amino acids with a single codon — Met and Trp
6th codonposition of the sickle-cell change in β-globin
70S = 50S + 30Sbacterial ribosome
80S = 60S + 40Seukaryotic ribosome
23S rRNAthe ribozyme that forms the peptide bond in bacteria
3164.7 million bpsize of the human genome (HGP figure)
3000 basesaverage human gene
2.4 million basesdystrophin, the largest known human gene
about 30,000estimated human gene count
99.9%of bases identical between any two people
less than 2%of the genome that codes for protein
2968 / 231genes on chromosome 1 / the Y chromosome
1.4 millionknown SNP sites
3300books of 1000 pages needed to print the genome
1990–2003the Human Genome Project
0.1 to 20 kbsize range of a VNTR

Every scientist, with the attribution trap attached

ScientistYearWhat they are credited withThe attribution trap
Friedrich Miescher1869isolated DNA from pus cells, called it nucleinnot the structure — that was 84 years later
Frederick Griffith1928transformation in Streptococcus pneumoniaeshowed that something transfers, not what
Avery, MacLeod, McCarty1933–44DNA is the transforming principlethe enzyme-subtraction logic is theirs, not Griffith's
Erwin Chargaffthe equal base ratiosmeasured them; did not build the model
Wilkins and Franklinthe X-ray diffraction dataFranklin died in 1958, so is not a Nobel laureate
Watson and Crick1953the double-helix model; predicted semiconservative replicationthe prediction is theirs, the proof is not
Hershey and Chase1952bacteriophage T2, ³²P and ³⁵S — DNA is the genetic materialthe blender step is essential, not decorative
Meselson and Stahl1958⁵N experiment proving semiconservative replicationin E. coli
Taylor and colleagues1958the same result in Vicia faba using radioactive thymidinethe plant version, often confused with Meselson–Stahl
George Gamowargued the code must be a tripleta physicist, not a biologist
Nirenberg and Matthaeithe cell-free system that cracked the code
Har Gobind Khoranasynthetic RNA of defined repeating sequence
Severo Ochoapolynucleotide phosphorylase, for making RNA of known sequencethe enzyme, not the code itself
Robert Holleythe structure of tRNAshared the 1968 Nobel with Nirenberg and Khorana
Francis Crickthe central dogma; predicted the adapter moleculepredicted tRNA before it was found
Jacob and Monod1961the operon model of gene regulationNobel 1965, shared with André Lwoff
Reiji Okazakithe short lagging-strand fragments
Frederick Sangerthe sequencing method the HGP automated
Alec JeffreysDNA fingerprinting using VNTR probes

Every exception

Every exception in the chapter, in one list

Mnemonics and anchors

Structure and code

  • Pure As Gold — purines are Adenine and Guanine
  • CUT the pie — pyrimidines are Cytosine, Uracil, Thymine
  • G≡C has three bonds, so GC-rich DNA is harder to pull apart
  • Degeneracy arrow points codons → amino acid. The other direction would be ambiguity, and the code is not ambiguous.

Transcription and translation

  • Polymerases I, II, III → r, m, t. The strays, 5S rRNA and snRNA, hang off III.
  • σ for start, ρ for release — s with s, r with r
  • z, y, a → beta, permease, acetylase; i makes no enzyme at all
  • H1 is the linker, so it links beads and cannot be inside one

The five personal traps, and the written defence for each

These are the error families that have recurred across Aamirah's papers. Each one has a specific written action, not a general warning — the action is what makes the difference under time pressure.

Error familyWhere it appears in this chapterThe written defence
Ratio reversalChargaff ratio questions, (A+T)/(G+C)Before any arithmetic, write the sentence “the group on top is the bigger group”. The flipped answer is always one of the options.
Right content, wrong arrangementCoding versus template strand; sickle-cell amino acid direction; match-the-column items; the histone listWrite your own answer out fully, with labels, before reading the options. Match label to label, not shape to shape.
Assertion–reason instabilityQ6 and Q14 in the question file; roughly one in five NEET questions from this chapterMark T or F beside each of the two lines on the paper before looking at the four options. Never read the pair as one sentence.
Attribution errorsGriffith versus Avery versus Hershey–Chase; Meselson–Stahl versus Taylor; Gamow versus NirenbergFor ‘which follows from X’ questions, check who did it, not only whether the statement is true. One option is always a true fact from the wrong experiment.
Blank-rate disciplineThe three numerical types, which most candidates skipThese are mechanical and unambiguous. They are the cheapest marks in the chapter and should never be left blank.

Beyond the NCERT text, but asked