🏠 NEET Home

B1 ILTS — 08-30-2026 · Botany · Error notes

Principles of Inheritance and Variation

Botany · 12 questions · scored 122 / 180

Every question flagged on this paper, worked through in full: what was given, what was asked, the concept, the formula, the steps written out, an animated diagram, and the shortcut that gets there faster. The weak areas for the chapter are set out at the end.

12Questions flagged
10Attempted, wrong
2Left blank
122Marks scored

Contents

Dark = attempted and missed · amber = left blank

Q 99Attempted · wrongABO blood group: assertion and reason

Assertion (A): Human ABO blood group is controlled by a single gene 'I'.
Reason (R): In human ABO blood groups, there are four types of phenotypes and six types of genotypes produced.

Her answerBoth (A) and (R) are false
Correct answerBoth (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation
1  Given
  • ABO blood group gene I, with three alleles: Iᵀ, Iᴿ and i.
  • Phenotypes: A, B, AB and O — four.
  • Genotypes: IᵀIᵀ, Iᵀi, IᴿIᴿ, Iᴿi, IᵀIᴿ, ii — six.
2  Asked

The truth of each statement and whether R explains A.

3  Concept

Both statements are true. The ABO system is controlled by a single gene with multiple alleles, and it does give four phenotypes and six genotypes.

But the counting in R does not explain the claim in A. Knowing how many phenotypes exist does not tell you the trait is governed by one gene — the numbers are a consequence of the single-gene, three-allele arrangement, not a reason for it.

4  Formula or rule
one gene, three alleles → 6 genotypes → 4 phenotypes (Iᵀ and Iᴿ are co-dominant, i is recessive)
5  Baby steps
  1. Assertion. ABO is a classic example of multiple allelism at a single locus. True.
  2. Reason. Six genotypes and four phenotypes is exactly right. True.
  3. Does R explain A? No — the counts follow from the single gene rather than establishing it.
  4. Both true, but R is not the explanation.
6  Diagram
The four disorders this chapter keeps testingDown'strisomy 21 (47)autosomal non-disjunctionTurner's45, XOsterile female, short statureKlinefelter's47, XXYmale, gynaecomastia, sterileSickle-cellpoint mutationGlu → Val at position 6AUTOSOMAL non-disjunction gives Down's; SEX-chromosomenon-disjunction gives Turner's and Klinefelter's
7  Shortcuts
Judge each statement true or false on its own first, then ask separately whether one causes the other. Merging the two questions is what leads to answers like “both false”.

Where the six genotypes come from: three alleles give 3 homozygotes + 3 heterozygous pairs = 6. Because Iᵀ and Iᴿ are co-dominant, IᵀIᴿ is its own phenotype (AB), which collapses six genotypes into four phenotypes.
Q 100Attempted · wrongKlinefelter's syndrome

What is the genetic disorder in which an individual has an overall masculine development, gynaecomastia, and is sterile?

Her answerTurner's syndrome
Correct answerKlinefelter's syndrome
1  Given
  • Overall masculine development — so the individual is male.
  • Gynaecomastia — development of breast tissue.
  • Sterile.
2  Asked

Which disorder this is.

3  Concept

The word masculine settles it immediately: Turner's syndrome individuals are female (45, XO), so it cannot be Turner's.

Klinefelter's syndrome is 47, XXY — a male with an extra X. The additional X produces some feminine development including gynaecomastia, and the individual is sterile.

4  Formula or rule
Klinefelter's = 47, XXY (male)  ·  Turner's = 45, XO (female)
5  Baby steps
  1. The individual is described as masculine, so look for a male karyotype.
  2. Turner's is 45, XO — female. Eliminated on the first word of the stem.
  3. Klinefelter's is 47, XXY — male, with an extra X.
  4. The extra X causes gynaecomastia and sterility.
  5. Klinefelter's syndrome.
6  Diagram
The four disorders this chapter keeps testingDown'strisomy 21 (47)autosomal non-disjunctionTurner's45, XOsterile female, short statureKlinefelter's47, XXYmale, gynaecomastia, sterileSickle-cellpoint mutationGlu → Val at position 6AUTOSOMAL non-disjunction gives Down's; SEX-chromosomenon-disjunction gives Turner's and Klinefelter's
7  Shortcuts
Read the sex first. These two syndromes are constantly confused, and the sex alone separates them:

Klinefelter's — MALE, 47, XXY, extra X, gynaecomastia
Turner's — FEMALE, 45, XO, missing X, short stature, rudimentary ovaries

A memory hook: Klinefelter has an eXtra X; Turner is one short (XO).
Q 102Attempted · wrongAutosomal non-disjunction

A disease caused by an autosomal primary non-disjunction is

Her answerSickle cell anaemia
Correct answerDown's syndrome
1  Given
  • Non-disjunction: failure of chromosomes to separate during meiosis.
  • Autosomal: involving a non-sex chromosome.
  • Primary: occurring in the first meiotic division.
2  Asked

Which disorder results from autosomal non-disjunction.

3  Concept

Two words filter the options. Non-disjunction produces a chromosome number abnormality, which rules out sickle-cell anaemia — that is a single base substitution with a perfectly normal karyotype.

Autosomal then rules out Klinefelter's and Turner's, which both involve the sex chromosomes. That leaves Down's syndrome, trisomy of chromosome 21.

4  Formula or rule
autosomal non-disjunction → Down's (trisomy 21)  ·  sex-chromosome non-disjunction → Turner's, Klinefelter's
5  Baby steps
  1. Sickle-cell anaemia: a point mutation (Glu → Val), not a chromosome count problem. Eliminated.
  2. Klinefelter's (47, XXY): non-disjunction, but of the sex chromosomes. Eliminated by the word autosomal.
  3. Turner's (45, XO): same objection.
  4. Down's syndrome: trisomy of chromosome 21, an autosome. Correct.
6  Diagram
The four disorders this chapter keeps testingDown'strisomy 21 (47)autosomal non-disjunctionTurner's45, XOsterile female, short statureKlinefelter's47, XXYmale, gynaecomastia, sterileSickle-cellpoint mutationGlu → Val at position 6AUTOSOMAL non-disjunction gives Down's; SEX-chromosomenon-disjunction gives Turner's and Klinefelter's
7  Shortcuts
Apply the two adjectives in the stem as filters, in order. “Non-disjunction” removes every gene-level disorder; “autosomal” removes every sex-chromosome disorder. Two words, three options gone.

Sort the chapter's disorders into two lists once:
Chromosomal — Down's (21), Turner's (XO), Klinefelter's (XXY)
Gene-level — sickle-cell, thalassaemia, haemophilia, colour blindness, PKU
Q 103Attempted · wrongReading a pedigree

In the following human pedigree, the filled symbols represent affected individuals. Identify the type of disorder represented in the pedigree chart.

Her answerAutosomal dominant
Correct answerAutosomal recessive
1  Given
  • A three-generation pedigree with filled symbols marking affected individuals.
  • Affected individuals appear in generation I and again in generation III.
  • Generation II shows no affected individuals.
  • Both males and females are affected.
2  Asked

The mode of inheritance.

3  Concept

The decisive feature is that the trait skips a generation: unaffected parents in generation II produce affected children in generation III. That is only possible if both parents were carriers — which means the allele is recessive.

Since both sexes are affected roughly equally, it is autosomal rather than X-linked.

4  Formula or rule
skips a generation → RECESSIVE  ·  both sexes affected → AUTOSOMAL
5  Baby steps
  1. Does it skip? Yes — generation II is unaffected but generation III is not.
  2. A dominant trait cannot skip: every affected child must have an affected parent. So dominant is eliminated.
  3. Therefore the allele is recessive, carried unseen through generation II.
  4. Autosomal or X-linked? Affected individuals include both sexes in comparable numbers, so it is autosomal.
  5. Autosomal recessive.
6  Diagram
Reading a pedigreeAUTOSOMAL RECESSIVEtrait can SKIP generationsunaffected parents →affected childboth sexes equallyAUTOSOMAL DOMINANTappears in EVERY generationevery affected child hasan affected parentno skippingThe single question that decides it: do two unaffected parentshave an affected child? If yes, the trait is RECESSIVE — itwas hidden in both carriers and reappeared. Dominant traits cannot skip.
7  Shortcuts
Two questions decide every pedigree, in this order:

1. Does the trait skip a generation? Yes → recessive. No → likely dominant.
2. Are both sexes affected about equally? Yes → autosomal. Mostly males → X-linked recessive.

The single strongest clue: two unaffected parents with an affected child proves the trait is recessive, with no further analysis needed.
Q 111Attempted · wrongMorgan's choice of Drosophila

Statement I: Morgan worked with the tiny fruit flies which complete their life cycle in about two weeks, and a single mating could produce a few progeny flies.
Statement II: Drosophila has many types of hereditary variations that can be seen directly with the naked eye.

Her answerStatement I incorrect, Statement II correct
Correct answerBoth statements incorrect
1  Given
  • Two statements about why Drosophila suited Morgan's work.
2  Asked

The truth of each statement.

3  Concept

Both statements alter one detail of an otherwise correct sentence, which is what makes them hard.

Statement I is right about the two-week life cycle but wrong about “a few” progeny — a single mating produces a large number, and that abundance is precisely why Drosophila was chosen.

Statement II is right that there are many hereditary variations, but NCERT specifies they are seen with a low-power microscope, not the naked eye.

4  Formula or rule
Drosophila: 2-week life cycle · LARGE progeny · variations seen under a LOW-POWER MICROSCOPE
5  Baby steps
  1. Statement I. The life cycle and the fly are described correctly, but a single mating gives a large number of progeny, not a few. Incorrect.
  2. Statement II. The variations are real, but they are observed under a low-power microscope. Incorrect.
  3. Both statements are incorrect.
6  Diagram
Linked genes: parental types dominatePARENTAL 62.8%RECOMBINANT 37.2%F₂ progeny of Morgan's w–m crossgenes on the SAME chromosome travel together, so parentalcombinations far outnumber recombinantsparental % = 100 − recombination % = 100 − 37.2 = 62.8
7  Shortcuts
When a statement is 90% familiar, the remaining 10% is where the error is. Read the quantifiers and the instruments — “a few” against “a large number”, “naked eye” against “low-power microscope”.

Why Drosophila, in four points: grown on simple synthetic medium; life cycle about two weeks; a single mating gives many progeny; males and females are easy to tell apart. Learn the four together and altered versions stand out.
Q 116Left blankRecombination frequency

Observe the diagrammatic representation of the parental generation in the fruit fly in Morgan's cross (white-bodied miniature-winged females × wild-type males). What would be the percentage of the parental combinations obtained in the F₂ generation of the cross?

Correct answer (left blank)62.8
1  Given
  • Morgan's cross involving the genes white (w) and miniature (m).
  • These two genes are tightly linked on the X chromosome.
  • Recombination frequency for white–miniature = 37.2% (NCERT value).
2  Asked

The percentage of parental combinations in F₂.

3  Concept

Every offspring is either a parental type or a recombinant, so the two percentages must add to 100.

For linked genes the recombination frequency is a direct measure of how often crossing over separates them. Once you know it, the parental percentage follows by subtraction.

4  Formula or rule
parental % = 100 − recombination %
5  Baby steps
  1. The white–miniature recombination frequency is 37.2%.
  2. Parental types make up all the rest.
  3. 100 − 37.2 = 62.8%.
6  Diagram
Linked genes: parental types dominatePARENTAL 62.8%RECOMBINANT 37.2%F₂ progeny of Morgan's w–m crossgenes on the SAME chromosome travel together, so parentalcombinations far outnumber recombinantsparental % = 100 − recombination % = 100 − 37.2 = 62.8
7  Shortcuts
Learn Morgan's two frequencies as a pair, because both appear as options:

white – yellow: 1.3% recombination (very tightly linked, so 98.7% parental)
white – miniature: 37.2% recombination (loosely linked, so 62.8% parental)

All four numbers — 1.3, 98.7, 37.2, 62.8 — were on this option list. Knowing which pair goes with which gene combination is the whole question.
Q 117Attempted · wrongLinkage and independent assortment

Assertion (A): Mendel's law of independent assortment is not applicable to completely linked genes.
Reason (R): Mendel observed that recombinants are not produced in case of complete linkage.

Her answerBoth correct, and (R) is the correct explanation
Correct answer(A) is correct, but (R) is incorrect
1  Given
  • Assertion about independent assortment and linkage.
  • Reason attributing an observation about linkage to Mendel.
2  Asked

The truth of each statement.

3  Concept

The assertion is true. Independent assortment requires the two genes to be on different chromosomes. Completely linked genes sit on the same chromosome with no crossing over between them, so they always travel together and the law fails.

The reason is false on attribution. Mendel never observed linkage — that was Morgan, working with Drosophila decades later. Mendel's seven pea characters happened to behave independently.

4  Formula or rule
Mendel → independent assortment  ·  Morgan → linkage and recombination
5  Baby steps
  1. Assertion. Complete linkage means the alleles never separate, so they cannot assort independently. Correct.
  2. Reason. The claim itself — no recombinants under complete linkage — is true, but it was Morgan who observed it, not Mendel. Incorrect.
  3. (A) is correct, but (R) is incorrect.
6  Diagram
Linked genes: parental types dominatePARENTAL 62.8%RECOMBINANT 37.2%F₂ progeny of Morgan's w–m crossgenes on the SAME chromosome travel together, so parentalcombinations far outnumber recombinantsparental % = 100 − recombination % = 100 − 37.2 = 62.8
7  Shortcuts
Check the name in the statement, not just the science. The physics of the claim may be perfectly right while the attribution is wrong — and that alone makes the statement false.

Keep the timeline fixed: Mendel (1865) worked with peas and found independent assortment. Morgan (1910s) worked with Drosophila and found linkage, recombination and sex linkage. Any statement crediting Mendel with linkage is wrong on sight.
Q 118Attempted · wrongIncomplete dominance in pea starch

If size of starch grains in pea is considered as phenotype, Bb alleles show:

Her answerDominance
Correct answerIncomplete dominance
1  Given
  • Gene B in pea, affecting starch grains.
  • BB gives large starch grains; bb gives small ones.
  • The phenotype being measured is starch grain size.
2  Asked

What kind of dominance Bb shows for this phenotype.

3  Concept

The heterozygote Bb produces starch grains of intermediate size — larger than bb, smaller than BB. An intermediate heterozygote is the definition of incomplete dominance.

The important subtlety: judged by seed shape, Bb peas are fully round like BB, so the same gene shows complete dominance on that phenotype. Dominance is a property of the phenotype you choose to measure, not of the gene alone.

4  Formula or rule
BB (large) > Bb (INTERMEDIATE) > bb (small) → incomplete dominance
5  Baby steps
  1. BB seeds have large starch grains; bb seeds have small ones.
  2. Bb seeds have grains of intermediate size — a blend.
  3. An intermediate heterozygote means incomplete dominance.
  4. Note the contrast: for seed shape, Bb is fully round like BB, so the same gene shows complete dominance there.
6  Diagram
What the heterozygote looks likeCOMPLETElooks like ONE parentAaINCOMPLETEa BLEND in betweenAaCO-DOMINANCEBOTH shown separatelyAaStarch grain SIZE in pea is intermediate in Bb — a blend,so INCOMPLETE dominance. Judged by seed SHAPE the same geneshows complete dominance. Dominance depends on the phenotype chosen.
7  Shortcuts
Blend or mosaic? That single question separates the two options that always appear together:

A blend — one new intermediate value → incomplete dominance
A mosaic — both parental types visible separately → co-dominance

This exact question has now appeared three times across the ILTS papers (ILTS-05 Q8, ILTS-05 Q31 and here). It is worth a dedicated line in the notes: starch grain size in pea = incomplete dominance.
Q 120Attempted · wrongColour blindness in sons

If a colorblind man marries a normal woman without any history of colorblindness in her family, then their sons will be

Her answerone-half colourblind and one-half normal
Correct answerall normal-visioned
1  Given
  • Father is colourblind: XᵇY.
  • Mother is normal with no family history, so she is homozygous normal: XᵄXᵄ.
  • Colour blindness is X-linked recessive.
2  Asked

The condition of their sons.

3  Concept

A son receives his Y from his father and his X from his mother. The father's affected X therefore never reaches a son — it goes only to daughters.

Since the mother carries no defective allele at all, every son gets a normal X and is normal-visioned.

4  Formula or rule
XᵇY × XᵄXᵄ → sons XᵄY (all normal), daughters XᵄXᵇ (all carriers)
5  Baby steps
  1. Father XᵇY gives either Xᵇ or Y.
  2. Mother XᵄXᵄ can only give Xᵄ.
  3. Sons = mother's Xᵄ + father's Y = XᵄY — all normal.
  4. Daughters = mother's Xᵄ + father's Xᵇ = XᵄXᵇ — all carriers, none affected.
  5. All sons are normal-visioned.
6  Diagram
X-linked inheritance: who gets which XFATHER XᵇYgives X to ALL daughtersgives Y to ALL sonssons NEVER get father's XMOTHER XᵄXᵇgives one X at randomto sons AND daughterseither child may receive itA colourblind FATHER passes his affected X only to daughters,so all his sons are normal — they take their X from the mother.A carrier MOTHER can pass hers to a child of either sex.
7  Shortcuts
A son's X comes from his mother, always. So an affected father can never give the condition to a son — for X-linked traits, look at the mother when asked about sons.

The classic pairing to hold:
affected father × normal non-carrier mother → all sons normal, all daughters carriers
normal father × carrier mother → half the sons affected, no daughters affected

The chosen answer is the correct answer to the second cross.
Q 128Left blankGenes on the same chromosome

Morgan carried out dihybrid crosses on Drosophila and observed that when the two genes in a dihybrid cross were situated on the same chromosome,

Correct answer (left blank)The proportion of the parental type gene combinations was much higher than the non-parental types
1  Given
  • A dihybrid cross with both genes on the same chromosome.
  • This is the definition of linkage.
2  Asked

What Morgan observed about the proportions of parental and non-parental types.

3  Concept

Genes on the same chromosome are physically tied together and tend to be inherited as a unit. They separate only when crossing over occurs between them, which is a relatively rare event.

So the parental combinations dominate, and recombinants form the minority. This departure from the expected 9:3:3:1 is exactly what revealed linkage.

4  Formula or rule
linked genes → parental types >> recombinant types
5  Baby steps
  1. Genes on the same chromosome travel together through meiosis.
  2. Only crossing over between them produces new (recombinant) combinations.
  3. Crossing over between closely linked genes is infrequent.
  4. So parental combinations far outnumber non-parental ones.
  5. For independently assorting genes the two would be equal — that contrast is how linkage was detected.
6  Diagram
Linked genes: parental types dominatePARENTAL 62.8%RECOMBINANT 37.2%F₂ progeny of Morgan's w–m crossgenes on the SAME chromosome travel together, so parentalcombinations far outnumber recombinantsparental % = 100 − recombination % = 100 − 37.2 = 62.8
7  Shortcuts
Recombinants are always the minority for linked genes. If they ever reached 50%, the genes would be assorting independently and would not be linked at all.

That gives a built-in check: any recombination frequency above 50% is impossible. The maximum is exactly 50%, which corresponds to genes so far apart on the same chromosome that they behave as if unlinked.
Q 130Attempted · wrongWho can inherit a mother's X

A woman has an X-linked condition on one of her X chromosomes. This chromosome can be inherited by

Her answeronly sons
Correct answerboth sons and daughters
1  Given
  • The woman has two X chromosomes, one carrying the condition.
  • She passes one X to each child, chosen at random.
  • Sons receive X from mother + Y from father; daughters receive X from each parent.
2  Asked

Which children can inherit that particular X chromosome.

3  Concept

A mother passes one of her two X chromosomes to every child, whatever its sex. So the affected X has a 50% chance of reaching any child — son or daughter.

The father's contribution differs by sex (X to daughters, Y to sons), but that has no bearing on which of the mother's X chromosomes is passed on.

4  Formula or rule
mother gives one X to EVERY child  ·  father gives X to daughters, Y to sons
5  Baby steps
  1. The mother has two X chromosomes and passes one at random to each child.
  2. A son gets that X plus a Y from his father.
  3. A daughter gets that X plus an X from her father.
  4. Either way, the affected X can be inherited.
  5. Both sons and daughters.
6  Diagram
X-linked inheritance: who gets which XFATHER XᵇYgives X to ALL daughtersgives Y to ALL sonssons NEVER get father's XMOTHER XᵄXᵇgives one X at randomto sons AND daughterseither child may receive itA colourblind FATHER passes his affected X only to daughters,so all his sons are normal — they take their X from the mother.A carrier MOTHER can pass hers to a child of either sex.
7  Shortcuts
Separate inheriting from expressing. That distinction is what this question is really testing:

Inherit — both sons and daughters can receive the mother's affected X.
Express — only sons will show a recessive X-linked condition, because they have no second X to mask it.

The answer chosen, “only sons”, is the right answer to a question about expression. Reading the verb in the stem — inherited — is the whole decision.
Q 135Attempted · wrongWhen phenotype does not fix genotype

Based on the phenotype, the genotype can be predicted in all of the following, except

Her answerWhite eyed fruit flies
Correct answer“B” blood group in humans
1  Given
  • Pink flowers in snapdragon — incomplete dominance.
  • “B” blood group in humans — multiple alleles.
  • White flowers in pea — recessive trait.
  • White-eyed fruit flies — X-linked recessive trait.
2  Asked

The one case where the genotype cannot be predicted from the phenotype.

3  Concept

The genotype is predictable from the phenotype whenever the phenotype corresponds to exactly one genotype. That is true for any recessive phenotype (it must be homozygous) and for any incomplete dominance heterozygote (it has its own distinct appearance).

It fails for a dominant phenotype in a system with multiple alleles: blood group B can be IᴿIᴿ or Iᴿi, and the two are indistinguishable by appearance.

4  Formula or rule
recessive phenotype → one genotype  ·  dominant phenotype → two possible genotypes
5  Baby steps
  1. Pink snapdragon: incomplete dominance, so pink is only Rr. Predictable.
  2. White pea flowers: recessive, so it must be homozygous. Predictable.
  3. White-eyed fruit flies: X-linked recessive, so females are XᵇXᵇ and males XᵇY. Predictable.
  4. Blood group B: could be IᴿIᴿ or Iᴿi — two genotypes, one phenotype. Not predictable.
6  Diagram
What the heterozygote looks likeCOMPLETElooks like ONE parentAaINCOMPLETEa BLEND in betweenAaCO-DOMINANCEBOTH shown separatelyAaStarch grain SIZE in pea is intermediate in Bb — a blend,so INCOMPLETE dominance. Judged by seed SHAPE the same geneshows complete dominance. Dominance depends on the phenotype chosen.
7  Shortcuts
Scan the options for a DOMINANT phenotype. Recessive and incomplete-dominance phenotypes each map to a single genotype; a dominant phenotype maps to two. So the dominant one is the answer to any “cannot be predicted” question.

The practical consequence: this is exactly why a test cross exists — crossing the unknown with a homozygous recessive is the only way to distinguish IᴿIᴿ from Iᴿi by breeding.

Weak areas — Principles of Inheritance and Variation

Ten of the twelve were attempted and missed — the willingness to commit is there, and only two were left blank. But the accuracy is the lowest of the four subjects relative to the attempt rate, and the errors sort into three clear groups.

1. Answering a neighbouring question (four cases). In each of these the option chosen is the correct answer to a different question:

QChosenThat answer belongs to
100Turner'sa female patient — the stem says masculine
120half the sons colourblinda carrier mother, not an affected father
130only sonswho expresses the trait, not who inherits it
135white-eyed fliesa recessive phenotype, which is predictable

2. Attribution and quantifier errors (two cases). Q117 credits Mendel with an observation that was Morgan's; Q111 alters “a large number” to “a few” and “low-power microscope” to “naked eye”. In both the science is right and one detail is swapped.

3. A three-time repeat. Q118 — starch grain size in pea showing incomplete dominance — has now appeared three times across the ILTS papers and been missed each time. It deserves a single dedicated line in the notes: blends blend, co-dominants coexist; starch grain size in pea is a blend.

The habit that addresses most of this: underline the deciding noun or verb in the stem before looking at the options — masculine, inherited, except, Mendel. Each of these questions turns on one word.